Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The below-mentioned areas are just indicative. The editorial board also welcomes innovative articles that redefine any Science and Technology field.

  1. Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  2. Physics, Material, and Mechanical Engineering
  3. Biology, Biological, and BioSystem Engineering
  4. Food and Agriculture Engineering
  5. Mathematics
  6. Computer Science and Engineering
  7. Earth Science and Engineering
  8. Space Engineering
  9. Electrical Engineering
  10. Architecture and Civil Engineering
  11. Environment Science and Engineering
  12. Basic Science in Engineering Education
  13. Engineering Education Reforms
  14. New Technologies in Education
  15. Industry and Education: A Continous Collaboration
  16. Research and Development in Engineering Education
  17. Globalization in Engineering Education
  18. Women in Engineering Education
  19. Computers, Internet, Multimedia in Engineering Education
  20. Organization of Laboratories
  21. Agricultural BioSystems Engineering Education
  22. Mechanical Engineering Education
  23. Electric and Electronic Engineering Education
  24. Civil Engineering and Architectural Engineering Education

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The Journal operates a peer review process and promotes blind reviewing. The acceptance or rejection of articles will be decided by the editorial boards based on the review results supplied by the reviewers. There are no communications between authors and editors concerning the rejection decision. Authors whose papers are rejected will be informed with the reasons for the rejection.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains will be published two times a year in the following months: June and December. Every issue consists of at least 6 articles and therefore every volume has at least 16 articles/reviews.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher, namely IKIP PGRI Pontianak.

Section A: Publication and authorship

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two Nasional Reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review processes are blind peer review.
  3. The factors taken into account in the review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely on the papers’ importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.

 

Licensing (Creative Commons)

This journal allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC BY SA. This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.

 

Abstracting and Indexing

Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains (SAINTEK) (e-ISSN: 2407-1536 | p-ISSN: 2089-2802) is open access and peer-reviewed journal, published by IKIP PGRI Pontianak, is indexed and abstracted in: