Analisis penerapan good university governance pada pelayanan administrasi akademik dan kemahasiswaan menggunakan TOGAF ADM

Irma Rosalina, Yani Nurhadryani, Irman Hermadi

Abstract


Good University Governance (GUG) is a college management concept that can improve the college quality in order to increase the public’s satisfaction and trust. The availability of academic, student data, as well inefficient business processes become issues in supporting quality improvement at Health Polytechnic Ministry of Health Palu. The study aimed to analyze the condition of GUG application in academic and student administration services at Health Polytechnic Ministry of Health Palu using The Open Group Architecture Framework Architecture Development Method (TOGAF ADM) stages. Identification of architectural principles and GUG principles are indicators of architectural goals to be achieved. The result indicated that there was a commitment related to the vision and mission of GUG, but the implementation of GUG principles could not be fulfilled. Inadequate use of application, report data which does not meet the needs of SPI and quality assurance, as well the elaboration of SOPs and authorities specifically are problems that make the objectives of transparency, accountability, quality assurance, and responsibility unfulfilled. The GUG principle determination into architectural principle is a strategic move in system development since GUG principle is an essential element in managing organizational needs

Keywords: Good University Governance,TOGAF ADM,Academic Administrasi Service.


Keywords


Good University Governance, Intelectual Capital; TOGAF ADM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalina, F., & Handayati, Y. (2020). Business Process Analysis and Improvement in Selling Process Using Business Process Modelling Notation ( BPMN ) at Locarvest. 2020, 459–477. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6619

Ansyori, R., Qodarsih, N., & Soewito, B. (2018). A systematic literature review: Critical Success Factors to Implement Enterprise Architecture. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.148

Bianchi, I. S., & Sousa, R. D. (2016). IT Governance Mechanisms in Higher Education. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 941–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.253

Directorate of Institutional and Cooperation Ditjen Dikti. (2014). Good University Governance (GUG). staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/statuta/latih/2014/03GoodUniversityGovernance.pdf

Dumitriu, D., & Popescu, M. A. M. (2020). Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 932–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011

Greeforst D, P. E. (2011). Arhitecture pricinple (J. L. G. Dietz, E. Proper, & J. Tribolet (eds.)). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20279-7

Hénard, F., & Mitterle, A. (2010). Governance and Quality Guidelines in Higher Education: A review of Governance Arrangements and Quality Assurance Guidelines. Oecd, 114. https://www.oecd.org/edu/imhe/46064461.pdf

Herlina, & Lestari, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Model Pengukuran Sistem Informasi Akademik Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model Dan Delone&Mclean. Jurnal ICT : Information Communication & Technology, 19(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.36054/jict-ikmi.v20i2.255

Hidayah, N, & Susanto, A. (2020). the Implementation of Good University Governance and Intellectual Capital in Universities At Different National …. Ijbel.Com, 21(1), 49–56. https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/IJBEL21_069.pdf

Hidayah, Nurul, Badawi, A., & Nugroho, L. (2019). GUC_Intelectual capital. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 5(2), 1–7.

Larasati, R., Asnawi, M., Hafizrianda, Y., Akuntansi, P. M., & Cenderawasih, U. (2018). 951-Article Text-3027-3-10-20190502. 2(2), 304–323.

Martini, R., Sari, K. R., Wardani, R. S., Zulkifli, Z., Hartati, S., & Widyastuti, E. (2020). Transparency and the Application of Good University. 298(iCAST 2018), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200813.045

Muhsin, Martono, S., Nurkhin, A., Pramusinto, H., Afsari, N., & Arham, A. F. (2020). The relationship of good university governance and student satisfaction. International Journal of Higher Education, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p1

Tajuddin, M. (2015). Modification of Delon and McLean model in the success of information system for good university governance. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 113–123.

The Open Group. (2018). Welcome to the TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, a standard of The Open Group. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/

Wardhani RS, S. (2020). Tata kelola perguruan tinggi.

Widjajarto, A., Lubis, M., & Yunan, U. (2019). Architecture model of information technology infrastructure based on service quality at government institution. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.191




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v11i1.3797

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Irma Rosalina, Yani Nurhadryani, Irman Hermadi

Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains

IKIP PGRI Pontianak, Gedung Rektorat Lt. 2
Jl. Ampera No.88, Sungai Jawi, Pontianak Kota, Kota Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat 78116
Telp. (0561) 748219
E-mail: saintek.ikippgriptk@gmail.com 


p-ISSN: 2089-2802 | e-ISSN: 2407-1536


View Stats


Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains is licensed under a
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.